Viola Eva and Gianluca Fiorelli

B2B Brand Visibility and Reputation in the AI Search Era | Viola Eva

30

min read

Viola Eva and Gianluca Fiorelli

B2B Brand Visibility and Reputation in the AI Search Era | Viola Eva

30

min read

Viola Eva and Gianluca Fiorelli

B2B Brand Visibility and Reputation in the AI Search Era | Viola Eva

30

min read

It's great to have you back on The Search Session. I’m Gianluca Fiorelli, and in this episode, I'm joined by Viola Eva, a digital entrepreneur with a background in SEO and digital marketing based in Berlin.

Our conversation digs into what it takes to build B2B brand visibility in the era of AI search — from becoming the source in LLMs to navigating the differences between ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot. 

We also look at the accuracy problem facing B2B brands and how AI is reshaping content marketing when human expertise meets smarter workflows.

What You'll Learn

  • What AI search experimentation revealed: long-term source authority remains the strategy to follow, while short-term tests like LinkedIn articles, listicles, and "Open in ChatGPT" CTAs can deliver surprising visibility gains. 

  • How to become the source in LLMs: B2B brands need to align all owned properties so AI systems represent them consistently. 

  • Why LLM optimization differs across models: AI search strategy needs to account for each model's ownership, partnerships, training data, and search systems. 

  • Why third-party sources distort brand reputation: outdated or incorrect external content can shape how LLMs describe a brand, making accuracy a bigger challenge than visibility. 

  • How support content drives LLM visibility: help docs, developer documentation, and support subdomains are becoming AI-cited sources, expanding SEO into customer support, retention, and customer marketing. 

  • Why skyscraper content is losing ground in B2B SEO: generic ultimate guides no longer deliver value, while original content with real information gain matters more for both buyers and AI systems. 

  • What brand impressions mean in AI search and LLMs: appearing as a citation may create value through repeated exposure and memory, even without clicks, while AI platforms provide little data to measure impact. 

  • How AI-assisted content marketing actually works: AI's value is not in naive use or generic content at scale, but in human expertise, smarter workflows, subject matter input, and creating things that weren't possible before. 

  • Why AI prototyping depends on organizational readiness: faster AI drafts are only useful if companies can also handle the review, approval, maintenance, and publishing processes needed to move quickly. 

Tune in for the full conversation. 

Topics covered: AI search · LLM visibility · LLM optimization · B2B SEO · brand visibility · brand reputation · support content · skyscraper content · brand accuracy challenges

About the Guest

Viola Eva

Viola Eva

Founder of Flow Agency

Viola Eva is a digital entrepreneur focused on helping B2B and SaaS brands grow through search, content, and AI-driven discovery. 

Since 2018, she has been running Flow Agency, a boutique B2B marketing agency for SaaS and professional services, delivering bespoke search marketing strategies, SEO consulting, content strategy, and growth-focused digital marketing. 

In 2024, she also became a growth mentor on the GrowthMentor platform, offering free mentoring to startups and sharing her expertise with founders building their next chapter. 

Viola is also a recognized international speaker, and she regularly shares her insights on SEO, content marketing, and AI search through her articles on the Flow Agency blog.

Transcript

Full conversation between Gianluca Fiorelli and Viola Eva

Gianluca Fiorelli: Hi, and welcome to The Search Session. I'm Gianluca Fiorelli, and today we are going to have as a guest the founder of Flow Agency, a marketing firm specializing in B2B SEO. And I’ll ask our guest to correct me if needed, but by B2B, the agency also refers to software as a service companies and professional services. 

Flow is a very interesting type of agency because it's 100% full remote. Our guest is in Germany, but all the other members are spread around the world. And I would ask her how it can coordinate all these different time zones. I would go crazy. Our guest is very well known for her results-driven and creative approach to ranking.

She recently changed the name of the agency from Flow SEO to Flow Agency. So clearly, the signs of time, we are not just doing SEO as it was considered once, but we are also moving into the new spaces of AI search or GEO, as many are starting to use, even Google.

Our guest today is Viola Eva. Hey, Viola. How are you doing?

Viola Eva: I am doing very well. The sun is shining. The trees are green, flowers are blossoming, and so Berlin is really lighting up, and so am I. So very excited to be here with you today.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, I think this is maybe the best season for Berlin because I remember Berlin during the summer as very hot. Am I right?

Viola Eva: Yes, it can get very hot. But I love spring and summer. I think everyone just gets happier, more lighthearted. Everyone is outside. All the cafes and restaurants are full now. And the art shows are starting, music shows, open airs. All my international friends are starting to come to Berlin, so for me, we are going into the best four or five months of the year now.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh, cool. And yes, here in Spain, where I live, it's getting wonderful. It is a little different. I mean, I love Valencia also in the summer, but the summer in Spain can be extremely hot. So this is the perfect time for me. Even if you want to come, you are welcome, but this is the best season.

Gianluca Fiorelli: So, talking about it, not about the weather, even if we could talk about the weather in the SEO world, let's talk about SEO. And let me ask you a classic question I ask all my guests: how is SEO treating you lately?

Viola Eva: I was wondering about my answer for a moment there because I think it would be easy to say that it's difficult, clients have higher expectations, or there's a lot of uncertainty. But I think the truth is actually I'm quite inspired.

I feel like I get to learn a lot. I feel like I get to experiment a lot, and I've been really enjoying that. I think I've been able to find my sense of curiosity again.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh, that's cool. And yes, I think that we are living in a moment now where the surprise and, somehow, the shock and, for many, also the terror that lived last year around this time have already passed.

And we are in the moment where we are somehow taking more control, trying to understand, seeing what things can be done, what we can do, and how we can deal with the disruption that, anyway, AI search means, especially in terms of classic traffic and so on.

Experimenting With AI Search and LLM Visibility

Gianluca Fiorelli: So it's the moment that we are really starting to work and experimenting and see what kind of experiments are working.

And in this case, I wanted to ask you, what kind of experiments did you do, and how do you manage the experiments? Obviously, I don't think you are going to experiment live with your clients, but maybe there are clients that are agreeing with you to test some specific tactics or strategy.

And how do you deal with this kind of experimentation for discovering what is the best way to take advantage of the novelty of AI search?

Viola Eva: That's a great question, and I love it. So if you ask me about my philosophy on LLM marketing and how to be successful sustainably and in the long run, I got very much inspired by my friend Alex Birkett, who used to work at HubSpot and now runs his agency. And he, I think, so eloquently said that being found in LLMs is all about either being the source, being mentioned in the source, or replacing the source.

And so when I work with my clients, I think that's what we leaned into, and sort of explaining the value that content still has, the value of uniqueness, and the value of thought leadership. At the same time, I think that is sort of my five-year vision of what I want my clients to do. And I think that is the sustainable way to be found in LLMs.

And then at the same time, I think some stuff has had an outsized positive effect over the last two years, and we've been consciously trying to play with some of these things.

So I think with some clients, we've been able to play with some LinkedIn articles, with some stuff on Medium. Your listicle, right? It's getting difficult now, and there's a lot of criticism on that now. We've played with that a little bit.

I think you saw on our blog that we've played with the sort of open in ChatGPT CTA. And really, I'm doing that not so much because, again, I don't think that this is the long-term strategy, but some of the stuff has had an outsized positive effect over the last years.

And some clients have been more open to this and just seeing like, “Hey, can we put something together, try it out for three months, and see what that does for us?” And for other clients, that's not really an option. They need a lot more certainty; they need a lot more knowledge.

So these are just a few things that we see people talk about on LinkedIn, and then we like to try them out ourselves and see if there's any truth behind this.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, good to know. It’s also reassuring for me, because I have a similar approach when talking with clients.

And yes, obviously, there are the ones that are, I wouldn't say "scared," but they don't want to break the things that are working. So they say, "No, everything was fine until now, so let's not try to break the toy," and others who are braver say, “Okay, let's try to do isolated tests and maybe take one specific topic, one specific area that we anyway want to improve, and let's try testing it, testing your theories, and so on.”

And I think it's the only way because, personally, I don't have the time to create my own website to test this, as I was doing 20 years ago. But it's also a good way to experiment and to grow, experimenting also with the clients and with the approval of the clients. This is the most important thing.

When you’re experimenting and testing new tactics for AI search, data is your best friend

Use AWR to track how these changes impact your visibility and share of voice in real-time. Don't just guess if your experiments are working, measure them.

Try Advanced Web Ranking for free and start measuring your SEO experiments.

LLM Optimization as Online Reputation Management

Gianluca Fiorelli: And I like it when you cite your friend, and you say that trinity of things: you are the source, or you are cited by the source, or you replace the source.

And in B2B, many times, maybe the third option is more common, I think, at least when I work with B2B, in the sense that, in certain niches of B2B, you arrive where the landscape is already owned somehow by more well-known brands.

So in classic search, you would've done a lot of link building, a lot of outreach, and so on and so on, in order to accrue authority. But in LLMs, it is not really just about backlinks because they don't care. It's about the replacement of a backlink, eventually.

But what is the way, what would you recommend for a B2B business that wants to be the source, the new source of truth, instead of a competitor?

Viola Eva: I think for me, being the source is the part that is most similar to methodologies and tactics and strategies that we know from SEO as well. So what I mean by being the source is that our content, our client's content, and all the web properties that they own actually win visibility.

And I think historically, when we thought about SEO, we've predominantly thought about the website, and I think that's definitely a big part of it. Pruning old and outdated content, making sure that the messaging on your website is actually up-to-date; these sorts of things, very normal SEO activity for me, fall into that.

And that is because, of course, a lot of LLM answers trigger a web search. I think it's good if your website is actually being found there.

Where we have expanded out a lot is that before a pretty specific focus on the website, now we really want to talk about all the web properties that our clients own, meaning that we want to have a well-optimized website, but we also want to have a well-optimized LinkedIn profile, G2 review site profile, and Capterra review site profile. We want to make sure our YouTube actually matches what our website is saying.

And what we're noticing here is that, of course, as companies grow, maybe Capterra was set up five years ago by a marketer who has now left. Maybe YouTube is something that you've really only started leaning into two years ago. Maybe your homepage actually has new information, new copy, based on a product launch that happened six months ago.

And so what we notice with a lot of our clients is that it's not just about growing visibility in LLMs. A big part is actually about growing accuracy and about LLMs talking about them in the right way.

And for that, we always start with the web properties that they own. Because if you don't present yourself holistically across all your web properties, then the LLMs also don't necessarily represent you correctly.

And so we've been doing a lot more messaging work, brand cleanup, and brand alignment than we maybe would've done three or four years ago.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes. I think that I usually say it as if it were a joke, but it's not really a joke. I usually say that doing SEO, GEO, or AIO for LLMs is many times like classic online reputation management because you don't know what the LLMs have ingested in their training data or recovered from live search with the fan-out. Because maybe things that you have been able to push into the second, third, fourth, or fifth page of Google in classic search, a fan-out can make them pop up very fast because they're so deep with a fan-out.

And I think that it is also interesting what you're saying, which is substantially the importance of omnichannel. Also, for all those who are very interested in knowledge graphs and entities, I remember Jason Barnard, for instance, is a very strong proponent of “your website is your web home,” but then all the others are your other homes. So you have to maintain consistency between what you say on your website and what you say in your other properties.

Viola highlights a crucial shift: SEO is now about owning every "home" your brand has online

Advanced Web Ranking allows you to track more than just your website - monitor your visibility for YouTube videos, LinkedIn profiles, and review sites to ensure your brand’s "source of truth" remains consistent across the web.

See how your brand stacks up across all platforms with a free AWR trial.

Differences Between ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot

Gianluca Fiorelli: And moreover, in consideration of this, I think it's interesting that, for instance, in the blog or resource section of your Flow Agency website, you did something that is, I would say, surprising, but it is not surprising per se. It is surprising that nobody else is doing this.

You created different guides for the different LLMs, which, if you think about it, is correct. When we talk about classic SEO, we think about Google, but it should be SEO for Google, SEO for Bing, SEO for Naver, for Baidu, etc., etc.

So it should also be the same for LLMs. And when you were preparing and also working, what were the biggest differences you've seen? What kind of differences within LLMs made you think, “Oh, I didn't think about this”?

Viola Eva: Yes, I appreciate you calling these out because this guide series was really a beast, and it's something that I really underestimated.

So just to tell you how these got created, of course, being good SEO and content marketers, we started doing research, started doing keyword research, and thought about what topics we wanted to write about on the blog.

And then I noticed that there's distinct search volume and search interest for these things: ChatGPT SEO, Gemini SEO, Claude SEO, and so on. So I thought, perfect, let's write these guides about it.

And I was speaking with Sofie Couwenbergh, who's the brilliant content marketer that helped me create them, and she said, "Look, with a topic like this, what people probably want is a how-to, right? They want tips, they want tricks, they want to understand how to do it.

But because we started writing these guides about six months ago, it actually wasn't all that obvious what the tips should be. Of course, we can tell people, cover a topic holistically, get your schema markup right and get your brand mentions. There are some things that we're starting to get a sense for that they matter, and that they're important, and you'll find that within the guides.

But actually, what we noticed quite quickly is that what's more interesting to talk about is a few things that hide very innocently in the tables. And I have to see maybe how we can make that visually more appealing, because there are a few tables in these articles that talk about who owns which LLM, who is invested, what are some of the most common media partnerships that they have, who they are working with, what is the latest cutoff date of their training data, and what web browser they use.

And so I think, in the end, yes, there are tips and tricks in the guides, but I think what is actually most meaningful is some of these tables and understanding the ownership structures and the media partnerships that they have and how they're different from each other.

And so that's where I would ultimately think it gets really, really interesting with these guides, to be honest.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, I'm glad that you talk about the media and partnerships because we always say that, for a brand to be visible in LLMs, it's important to show off.

So to be able to be cited and mentioned by media outlets, and obviously, if you know what media outlets have partnerships with OpenAI, with Gemini, with Claude eventually, and so on, with Bing, then you know what kind of news outlets, for instance, to target, what publishers to target for obtaining stronger visibility, for instance, in ChatGPT.

Viola Eva: Exactly.

Gianluca Fiorelli: And what surprised me positively is that among the guides, you have maybe the only guide about Copilot, which is weird because I think this is somehow a bias we have as SEOs, especially in Europe, regarding Microsoft and Bing, and we transfer it also to Copilot.

But Copilot, at the end of the day, is like Gemini. It's everywhere in every application of Microsoft, not just Bing. And so it can be a wonderful second or third surface for a brand to appear. And that was a very positive surprise I had.

Viola Eva: And you know why we did that, though? Because, again, we work in the B2B context, so there's a good amount of our clients who sell to enterprise customers.

And what you will notice is that if you take, I don't know, an e-commerce business or a lifestyle brand, and you look, where do people find us, often the traffic from Bing is very small, right? It can be 2%, 3%, or 5%.

But for our clients that are selling to the enterprise, sometimes traffic from Bing can be 10% or 15%. And that is because a lot of big organizations run on Microsoft, and they use Microsoft OneDrive and their default browser. They have, like, I may have Gemini as my default because I live in the Google Workspace. They have the Microsoft infrastructure as a go-to at work.

And so that's why we noticed that, for our clients who sell to the enterprise, there's a lot more traffic from Bing. And so we subsequently assumed that Copilot is also a lot more interesting to them, even though I understand that, from a consumer perspective and in private, most people are on ChatGPT; maybe now they're on Claude.

I understand that as consumers, we are not talking about Copilot so much, but people who have a very rigid IT infrastructure and who live in the Microsoft universe, these people are on Copilot.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, indeed. Indeed. I mean, there is a very easy way to understand it when they invite you to a video call. How many are using Meet and how many are using Teams? 

Viola Eva: Exactly right. And that was sort of the thinking.

Reputation, Reviews, and Accuracy Problems in LLMs

Gianluca Fiorelli: And one thing that I want to touch on with you is, for a B2B brand, reputation is everything. Because they can offer the best products, the best tools, everything, but there is no way they can grow without a reputation. 

The reputation is at the base of trust, especially in B2B. And depending on the kind of B2B, especially B2B where money and contracts are very big, it's essential, obviously.

So, did you see some differences between LLMs in how they treat these kinds of reviews, especially reviews in the review field? How do they treat reviews?

There is always this thing that ChatGPT, I think Perplexity or ChatGPT, is using substantially only Reddit and so on, but did you see something different depending on the LLMs?

Viola Eva: Yes, it's a great question, and I agree with you that reputation matters a lot.

And again, I want to repeat: I think for a lot of our clients, it's really about accuracy. And I think this is always true, but specifically because we work with tech and professional services, and people update their software, they update their features, they update how they're selling.

And so a lot of them actually don't have a visibility problem. They have an accuracy problem.

So, for example, an LLM will say they don't have an integration, even though they now have it. Or an LLM will talk. A lot of our clients are also sales-led, so their pricing is not on the website. But of course, people ask an LLM about pricing, and what happens is that the only source about this is a Reddit thread from seven years ago where an upset user talks about your pricing.

And all of a sudden, the LLM gives an answer about pricing, but it's incorrect.

And so that aspect of accuracy, I think, is something that people really struggle with. And I think specifically in the SaaS space, where people move so quickly.

I have one example that I talked about before. One of our clients, Betterworks, used to do OKR software, so goal-setting software, and they've now transitioned into employee performance management software, and they've transitioned into that, I believe, for four or five years.

In the beginning, all the LLMs would always call them human capital management software. If you're not in HR and you're not in HR tech, you might think, “Oh, employee performance management and human capital management are kind of the same.” It's not the same. It's a different product. It's different expectations. It's a different workflow.

And the number one reason why they got cited incorrectly is that there's a content site called TechTarget, which had an article that's called “What is Betterworks?” that was ranking incredibly well, and where they were described in the wrong way.

So, to your point, what we see a lot of is Reddit information being an issue for our clients. We see listicles from competitors that knowingly or unknowingly talk about them in the wrong way. We see listicles and articles from content sites, again, that knowingly or unknowingly talk about them in the wrong way.

Then we see, unfortunately, as I said at the beginning, their own web properties, their own old content, their own stuff, talking about them in the wrong way.

And the priorities change a little bit, but what we've noticed is that there are usually two or three sources that really break it for them. Sometimes it's Reddit. One time, it was this TechTarget article. Another client really struggled with being described incorrectly, and in the end, it was their very own Google Business Profile that was wrong and made everything wrong.

And so we notice there are usually two or three sources that have such a dominance. And if they're wrong, basically everything starts coming out wrong.

And to be honest, for Reddit, we haven't found a very good answer yet, because the thing is, if the Reddit thread's very old, it might already be closed too.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes.

Viola Eva: So Reddit, and then competitors knowingly or unknowingly describing companies incorrectly, is what we're really grappling with right now.

And I agree, I find ChatGPT pretty listicle- and Reddit-heavy. Not all of the LLMs are the same in that way.

But yes, that's what we're grappling with right now: how do we make sure these third-party sites actually talk about our clients correctly?

Gianluca Fiorelli: I think the problem is also what I call the Mad Cow Syndrome, in the sense that a lot of the content is based on what the LLM is suggesting the writer to write.

And if the source that LLMs are citing is incorrect, the content based on LLM sources is going to be incorrect. And the writer, if he's not going directly to copy-paste what the LLM has written, is going to paraphrase what the LLM is suggesting. So it's going to be like the dog that bites its own tail.

Viola Eva: 100%.

Gianluca Fiorelli: It's a situation that is somehow making us feel as if our work is maybe not the sexiest thing, but the most important thing is governance. Governance is becoming central in our work.

Yes, the case of rebranding or repositioning is an interesting one because I saw it also with a client of mine. They were more of a sort of Canva competitor, but they wanted to move on to a more enterprise-type client. They even changed the brand name. 

The problem was that they were so known for what they were offering before that it's extremely hard, also because of a cutoff of training data, to make LLMs understand that there is this passage and that we are not what we were.

And in this case, the strategy we were following is to recognize our past. To own the narrative about the past, but to somehow explain very well that that was in the past, even, for instance, the old brand name.

Instead of doing the classic thing, like, you know, which is, I'm citing because they are my friends; it's not a problem, but it's fun. Lumar, formerly known as Deepcrawl, which is actually the entire name: Lumar, formerly Deepcrawl.

Instead of doing that, using structured data, for instance, and using the alias for the brand, using as alias the old name of a brand, and so on, to really push the machine to understand the changes of our branding.

The Rising Importance of Help Centers and Developer Docs

Gianluca Fiorelli: And another thing, and this came when you were talking, I remembered another conversation I had here with Gaetano DiNardi, who also works with SaaS.

From Gated PDFs to AI-Visible Content

Gianluca and Gaetano DiNardi dig into a classic SaaS problem: the best content is often trapped in PDFs, help centers, or developer subdomains. 

Watch their conversation on why ungating and repurposing that content into SEO-friendly HTML may be one of the biggest opportunities for SaaS brands in the AI search era.

Gianluca and Gaetano DiNardi

Viola Eva: Yes, I love his work.

Gianluca Fiorelli: And I remember when I was talking with him, he was saying that now, especially with SaaS, all those subdomains, the help subdomain, the developers subdomain, all these subdomains that were somehow neglected before…

Viola Eva: The LLMs love them.

Gianluca Fiorelli: …aren’t they becoming the most important source of content?

Viola Eva: We have also had this experience with some of our clients. I think the question then is, what is the goal of your LLM visibility strategy?

Because I think that if you have a lot of developer documentation and help documentation, it's actually a good thing if your customers are struggling to do something and they're asking ChatGPT how to solve the issue, and ChatGPT is helping them to solve the issue. I mean, that's what you want, right? You want your customers to have an easy way to solve their problems.

And so definitely, we've seen the same. We've seen that support documentation and help docs get a lot of attention from LLMs, and they're cited a lot. They get a lot of referral traffic as well.

At the same time, most of our clients make us in charge of new business acquisition, not as much customer marketing or customer retention, even though some of them do it as well.

And so I think historically, yes, SEOs maybe were not as deeply involved in customer marketing, and now that's actually a way in which we can help. And we can help a different business function than maybe previously, when we were confined to only new business and acquisition through search.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Interesting, interesting. And when it comes to content, because I know that you like content.

Viola Eva: I do.

Is the Skyscraper Technique Still Useful?

Gianluca Fiorelli: One classic was this: I don't know if you agree with me, but can we say that the skyscraper technique is finally something of the past, or can it still be useful in certain occasions? You know, creating this huge, enormous ultimate guide.

Viola Eva: So I think, similarly, I really want us to be very mindful of the type of business you have and the purpose of your website in the marketing strategy for this business.

So again, our clients are predominantly B2B. A lot of them have quite a high average deal size. For a lot of them, it's actually not a volume play. It's okay if only 20 people come to a page if they are the right people. I think this is a little bit different. 

But if you are an affiliate marketer, or if you have an e-commerce business, and your average order value is $20, then it's very much a volume play. And you need a lot of people to come to your website. You need a very good, neat, and well-optimized funnel in order to make your business work.

So I think that for a long, long time, also in B2B and also in software, people have been getting inspired by the HubSpot playbook, right?

They rank for everything and anything. They have an ultimate guide about everything. Their best-ranking article is an article about the shrug emoji. I think for a long time that was sort of useful, but I think what we've learned now, specifically in B2B, is that traffic and that content actually never really had any business impact to begin with.

Maybe there was a little bit of impact on brand awareness and touch points. I don't want to completely rule it out.

But I think there's now a lot more awareness of this type of top-of-funnel content, though I would argue the shrug emoji is probably not even at the top of the funnel; I think we're so far away.

Gianluca Fiorelli: It’s a very deep blue ocean of marketing.

Viola Eva: We're not even in the funnel anymore.

But I think we're more cognizant now that a lot of this content used to drive a lot of traffic, but it didn't necessarily help us with the people who are currently in-market, currently actively buying, trying to make a decision.

So I think that's where very abstract, top-of-funnel content has a really hard time right now justifying itself to our clients.

I think there's an argument to be made around topical authority and the fact that having these articles helps you to rank for other stuff and appear for other stuff. But I think we are having a much harder time making a business case for some of this stuff.

The reality, though, is that the agents can endlessly read content, and so I feel like they're probably reading this content more than humans. You know, like, are humans reading the 6,000-word skyscrapers? I don't think we've been really reading it.

And so I actually think, oddly, some of this stuff is being read now more, but I think it's being read by agents and crawlers.

The question is no longer “Did we publish more content?” but “Did visibility improve where it matters?” 

Advanced Web Ranking helps you track whether original, high-intent content gains visibility and competitive ground in both classic and AI search

Try AWR free and measure content impact beyond traffic.

Original Content, Information Gain, and Thought Leadership

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, I think so too. And actually, for instance, as you and people listening to us know, I tend to write because I cannot resist it; I write very huge, long pieces of content.

Viola Eva: But you don't write the “what is” kind of thing.

Gianluca Fiorelli: No, no, no.

Viola Eva: You write in detail, and you write what I would call thought leadership. That's also different from the classic sort of SEO thing. 

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, and you know, Dan Petrovic, Dejan, created a tool; I don't remember which one of the many tools that he created, but the one that makes you see how an LLM is chunking your content and how much of your content it really reads.

And I was surprised because I don't know if it's because of the way I write and so on—next, I'm going to talk to you and ask you something about this—but even if I write something like 5,000 words, I see from the tool of Dejan that 75% of the content is read by LLM. And it's more about how you write than how much you write.

Viola Eva: I would really like to point out that you are writing something original. With information gain. We got sort of lazy with the skyscrapers in the last five years. And we are doing all these glossaries, we are doing all these skyscrapers, but we are really writing the same thing.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes.

Viola Eva: I always tell my clients, if I could take your article and just copy it on your competitor's blog, and no one would notice, why do you even have it?

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh, I do have the same test. I ask the same question. What I do is ask my clients to open their blog on their mobile and put text only. So, you know, just read the text, stripping out all the design, which is a usability thing that you can do with a mobile browser, and ask them, "If you read the blog post like this, do you understand that it is written on your website?"

Viola Eva: That's why I think the LLMs like your content, because you're adding something new to the conversation. You are thinking about things deeply, you are sharing from your experience, and I think there's a lot of value in doing that.

I'm still a content marketer, as much as I—for example, with the whole zero-click universe—totally believe that the age of traffic is gone. I totally believe we are never going to get as much traffic to our websites again as ever before.

SaaS Visibility Beyond Google

Gianluca and Bengü Sarıca Dinçer explore what modern SaaS SEO looks like when traffic and rankings are no longer enough. 

Watch their conversation on how SaaS brands can build visibility across AI search, documentation pages, and the wider discovery journey.

Gianluca and Bengü Sarıca Dinçer

Viola Eva: I personally also believe that there are businesses that don't need a website. I think, I don't know, if you're a restaurant, maybe you're better off having a really good TripAdvisor, a really good Google Business Profile. You probably don't need a website.

If you're a TikTok influencer, maybe you just need a very well-optimized Amazon listing that you send traffic to. So I don't necessarily think every business needs a website.

I also think the age of traffic is gone. But I have always been, and always will be, an advocate for content marketing. And I think what we are now noticing again is that we got kind of sloppy with our content marketing, and we've been putting out pretty cheap, repetitive stuff for SEO. It's now not doing anything for us anymore.

And actually, to my previous point, I think it probably never did anything for us. And so I think it's more that we are having some sort of reckoning where we have to be more honest about what is having an impact.

And so that's why, yes, I'm still very much a believer in original, interesting content. I just don't think every business necessarily needs a website. And I also think some SEO strategies have now aged kind of poorly.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, totally. I still believe that, also for SEO, let's say organic search on every surface, information, and content are still very important, not necessarily in the form of a blog or a magazine, but having pieces of informational content, maybe even embedded in a product feature page, is important because they are useful for helping a strategy where you can be visible all along during all the search journey or the customer journey, which is usually done outside your website.

So that content is needed to make your website pop up on every surface, depending on the stage of the micro-moments.

What Is the Value of an AI Search Impression?

Viola Eva: I actually have a question for you, if I can ask.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh, yes.

Viola Eva: So, one thing that I have been trying to get to the bottom of is, what do we consider now the value of an impression?

And let me explain. If people are chatting, let's say with ChatGPT, they're getting information; they're being educated. I think there's actually quite a low likelihood that they will click through to a website unless maybe they want to submit a form.

I think there is probably some value in being a citation and keep appearing. And I believe that there's some value because, for example, no one ever comes to your website from LinkedIn either. No one really comes to your website from TikTok either. 

Gianluca Fiorelli: Or YouTube.

Viola Eva: People stay within these platforms, and we love the followers. We love the views, we love the impressions. We know that they have a business impact.

And so I do think that an impression in an LLM or an impression in an AI Overview has some sort of value. But I have a hard time articulating it because I think on a social media platform, either you win a follower and they keep seeing your content, or with TikTok, they actually keep pushing your content even if they're not your followers.

So there's repetition and people seeing you consistently. And I don't know that we have the same argument or math yet for an impression in AI search or LLMs. And so I'd be curious about your thoughts on it.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Well, I am very confused, folks, in this case, but surely an impression is an impression.

I have to go back to my time when I wasn't doing digital, and I was doing television. And then it is like the impact of a TV spot when people are watching television or listening to television while watching a second screen, which is a mobile device. Usually. It's a memory inception. Inception of a brand in the memory. Especially if a mention of a brand is constant. It's getting people used to. 

So this ultimately can become something like a classic billboard that you see in the corner of your street. You are maybe not thinking about that brand, but you have it in your memory, in your unconscious memory.

So maybe when the moment you need something comes, your brain associates it with that brand. But it is very hard to measure.

Viola Eva: You're making an argument sort of on a touchpoint. Is that argument like, I don't know, people used to see you seven times to make a decision? Now they need to see you a million times. Is that sort of like how you think?

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, this is something like this, but if I come back to remembering the initial patent of SGE, when Google was still calling AI overview as SGE, one of the things that Google was calculating was how much people, when scrolling or swiping, stopped in a certain part of the AI answer. 

And for instance, if they stop in a chunk of AI answer where a brand name is, it calculates the time, and if the time passed a defined threshold, then that part of the answer is going to be maintained.

Because they see that it's like accumulating user engagement signals on Chrome, using how people are using Chrome. And so maybe this is probably true for AI overview, for AI Mode, for Gemini. I don't know if it's also similar in other models.

Because if not, how can, in this case, Google assess the quality of an answer with respect to the quality of another answer, even if they always change the answer? But even if the answers are usually different, and even if not all the brands are cited in the same answer, if a prompt is just changing a little bit, the structure and the overall meaning of the answer usually tend to be the same.

For years, they accommodated information on the classic search result pages. They probably are doing the same for the AI answer pages, accommodating data and saying, “Okay, this is the type of format that we must represent for answering this prompt, this question, and all the possible infinite variations of the same question.”

The problem is that this is not something that you can measure, and the problem is what you were saying; at least for social media, we have the social media data offered by it. In this case, we don't have any data, and it seems like we are substantially like Don Quixote in trying to fight against the windmill, which is Google and the other big tech, asking them to give us data.

I mean, we were supposing that when, for instance, OpenAI started with advertising, it was going to give some data, but it's nothing.

Viola Eva: Yes, exactly.

AI visibility is still hard to value, but it should not be invisible. AWR helps you build a measurement layer around AI search presence, brand mentions, and classic ranking performance. 

Try Advanced Web Ranking free and start quantifying your visibility in the AI search era.

Human-in-the-Loop Content and Smarter AI Workflows

Gianluca Fiorelli: This is what I think. And regarding the content, we unfortunately have the possibility to create so much content and so much faster, more content with AI, but how much more critical is the human-in-the-loop for you?

Viola Eva: I am very inspired by AI. So inspired that Helene Jelenc, who is currently our director of SEO, is moving into a new position, and she's going to be called Director of Innovation. And she's fully focused on working on our own internal AI workflows, as well as services for our clients.

So, that being said, I feel like asking AI to create content for you is maybe one of the most boring use cases. I know it's very cheap. I know it's very straightforward. I understand that everyone can do it. But I don't. And I also understand that a lot of this content has had a positive impact over the last two or three years, right? There are very famous case studies that have put thousands and tens of thousands of AI articles on their website, and they started getting visibility. They started appearing in LLMs. So I understand where it's attractive to people. 

Now, of course, as you know, Google is being a lot less patient with these people now. They lose visibility in Google, they lose visibility in LLMs.

I think it was one of the easiest use cases. We've done it early on. I've never been inspired by that type of content creation because I'm a content marketer at heart, and I love content. So what we're now doing with a lot of clients is actually thinking a lot more.

I think it's an unrealistic expectation that everyone is still gonna write everything by hand again. I think that ship has sailed, right? There's such a massive productivity gain. And so what we now work with clients on is we try to help them select their AI tools.

And we try to work with them a lot, such as, “Do you do a custom build? If you do a custom build, is it GPT? Is it a Claude? Is it a Gemini? Do you use a tool that already exists? If it does exist, what kind of brand guidelines and information are you uploading in there? Is there a way to interview your subject matter experts and feed into that?

I've seen people do really phenomenal and interesting things with AI. And so what we are trying to coach our clients into is like, “Yes, use AI.” The enemy is not AI; the enemy is naive AI usage. And I think bad content at scale.

Then the other thing that we are now thinking about is like, “Yes, it's fun to write content with AI, and you can make a good one, but what is the thing that AI enables that we couldn't even do before?”

So that's where we are now, thinking more about different tools and workflows and things that just were not possible before. So is the naive content that I’m not inspired by.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes.

Viola Eva: Using AI for call recordings, building out knowledge bases, and then creating content from it. I am very inspired by it, but I think the emerging question is, what is it that we can do now in content marketing that we've never been able to do before?

And so I think it's an opportunity again for us to now be creative and do things that we couldn't do before. So that's more, I think, where my brain is going at.

And I think there's a lot we can actually learn from people in brand, from the people in field marketing, and just people who, in general, I think have brought a more playful approach to marketing than maybe the SEOs have.

And I think there's something from their book that we can learn in this new era of search marketing.

AI can speed up production, but SEO teams still need reliable measurement to know what works

AWR gives you the ranking and visibility data needed to validate AI-assisted content workflows. Try Advanced Web Ranking free to test, measure, and refine your AI-era SEO strategy.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Totally. Totally. In fact, this is also how I use AI. And for instance, if I have a theory, or I have a classic idea that is popping up in my mind. I'm not just talking about using AI as a brainstorming tool, but for instance, if I wanted to create some sort of weird connection between two things, if I were needing to do it by myself with scouting sources on the internet, it would be very painful. 

It would be almost the same thing as going into the library, but at least if you go to the library, you have a good librarian. The librarian is going to help you much more than searching on Google.

So what I do with AI is, and as an example, let's talk about something that is going to be published this month in AWR. I had this study that I have in the past about semiotics, and especially in visual, and I had this idea of YouTube, but YouTube is now more watched on TV than on the classic smartphone or even on the laptop.

So I wanted to say, how could we use the semiotic theory of cinema for YouTube in order to create better YouTube videos? So, I ask for this sort of connection to an AI. What I do sometimes is ask the same question to Gemini, to Claude, and to ChatGPT in deep thinking and see what they say. And especially what sources they are picking up.

Because, in this way, I have the sources, and I have a first idea, and maybe I will say, "Okay, this is an interesting idea, an interesting perspective." But especially they're giving me all the sources that I need.

Viola Eva: Exactly, exactly. And I think that's where the experimenting and prototyping are. I'm not sure I'm a believer that, for example, every piece of software can be immediately replaced by AI.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes.

Viola Eva: Because I feel like sometimes when you're building a prototype with AI, you're buying yourself the headache of costs for API requests, maintenance, and all of that.

I think the power of prototyping, whether that's a technical project, a research project, an innovative content project, or a video, is sort of like what I would like for us to lean in.

The other thing I want us to keep in mind is that the sort of prototyping and drafting is only one part of the equation. And the other part of the equation is actually the organization, meaning that it's great if you can have a first draft with AI in one day.

But if this thing now needs to go through four review cycles from five teams that have other priorities and other things going on, it still might take six weeks to publish, just because the organization is not set up for orchestrating, reviewing, approving, and publishing quickly.

And so I feel like when we talk about prototypes and drafts overnight, it’s ok, but is your company also ready to publish more quickly? And so again, these are some of the questions that I'm curious about.

What can we do that is new and has never been done before? And where are we still blocked by the same constraints as before? Yes, our draft is faster, but the editorial review still takes four weeks. And so I think the whole thing is more complex than people want to make it out on LinkedIn.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes. It's, again, governance, a different type of governance, but still governance.

Running a Fully Remote Global Agency

Gianluca Fiorelli: And talking about organization, when I was introducing you, I was saying how Flow Agency is a 100% full remote agency.

Viola Eva: Yes.

Gianluca Fiorelli: It was interesting to see the team map on your website, showing where all the people are living and working.

And then all of a sudden, I saw that almost all the time zones available in the world are covered by Flow Agency, which can be great in terms of clients; they can be from everywhere.

But when it comes to organizing your work as an agency, how did you deal with these big differences?

Viola Eva: Yes, when I started the agency, I did this a lot under this idea of freedom. I've always been inspired by how I can have, for example, freedom of location and movement, and freedom to choose my own projects and have my own ideas. And so I think that's how I came to it. 

The first people that I hired were also people that I've known from before and that I've worked with previously, and I enjoyed working together. And then I asked them to come over here. 

It's only been maybe the last three years that we're really hiring classically, right? Putting up a job post, having all the candidates apply with interviews. That's really more the last three years, four years.

In the beginning, it was a lot based on people that I've met, that I've enjoyed working with, and that I've asked to work together again.

I think now what happens is that our brand has a very specific flavor with the type of activities that we do. Being so multicultural, being so B2B and tech-driven, I think that's a specific flavor, and we notice that some people respond very well to this, independent of their location.

And so when we go through our hiring process, we mainly screen for that. We screen for their appetite for learning; we screen for their expertise, but we also screen to see if these people can work in a culture where everyone has different expectations around how to give feedback, how to learn, how assertive to be, and how not assertive to be.

And it's definitely not always easy. And we have sort of reined it in now with the time zone. So if you want to start with us now, you sort of have to be between the East Coast and Europe because otherwise it's just too difficult.

But that actually works well for us also because the vast majority of our clients are either in America or in Europe. And so, we have a few Australian clients, but that's always a bit harder because you can never have all three continents in a meeting at the same time. And so now our focus is really Europe and the Americas, and that works quite well.

Gianluca Fiorelli: It's interesting because sometimes I have had this kind of situation. The weirdest situation I had, it was me in Spain, the client was in the United States, and the developer team was in India. And the United States was on the Pacific.

Viola Eva: Yes, that’s very difficult, because someone always has to stay up late at night.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, and the client was on the Pacific Coast. So not even the East Coast.

Viola Eva: 5:00 PM is my favorite slot. All the Californians want to call me at 5:00 PM because that's their 9:00.

Gianluca Fiorelli: For me, yes.

Viola Eva: That’s why it’s difficult for me to schedule that. And I also had to ask you, “Oh, can we wiggle this around? Can we end five minutes early?

Now it's working because it's Friday, but I think that 5:00 PM slot is usually the most competitive slot on my calendar because that's 9:00 AM for the Californians. And that's when everyone wants to book.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Yes, it is for me too, the same when I'm with all my clients on the Pacific Coast.

Beyond Work: Books, Flow States, and Personal Passions

Gianluca Fiorelli: But let’s stop talking about work, and let's talk about you. I think on the Flow Agency website, one of the coolest things is the profile page. And it's nice; it explains things both of work and personal, and there you are recommending a book, which is a huge, long title, Stealing Fire: How Silicon Valley, the Navy SEALs, and Maverick Scientists Are Revolutionizing the Way We Live and Work by Stephen Kotler. And who cannot say that Stephen Kotler must always be read? But I'm asking you, what about a non-marketing book you like?

Viola Eva: What's my favorite marketing book? Is what?

Gianluca Fiorelli: No, the contrary.

Viola Eva: Non-marketing book. Ah, perfect. Well, yes, Steven Kotler, I've enjoyed it, right? Stealing Fire came out, I think, in 2017 or so, and I was very inspired by it. And when I started the business, it was very much because of that book.

He talked already about flow states in The Rise of Superman. He talked about flow states again in Stealing Fire, and it was very much inspired by that.

I was working for him for a few months, also running his content marketing and helping with the launch of The Art of Impossible. Quite good friends with his co-founder, Rian Doris. So yes, I have definitely been very, very inspired by him.

If my non-favorite nonfiction book, I don't know if it's my favorite one, but I can tell you what I'm currently reading. It's a German author called Leif Randt, and he is sort of like, I guess, talking about my friends and me. He writes books about people, Germans who are in their 30s, and sort of trying to understand life and meaning.

And so his last two books are what I've read recently and what I've really enjoyed and what I recommend people to check out.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Cool. And one of the nice things about the biography page for Flow is the real use of the name of the brand, which is the word "flow," as the philosophy of the brand.

So you put in yoga, dancing, and ice bath. Which is something that I couldn't do and never would; it would be horrible for me to do an ice bath. I know that it is something quite common there in Berlin to do. I have a friend who usually posts photos when in one of the many parks of Berlin, doing ice bath.

Viola Eva: People jump in. They do it in the lakes. They do it in the winter. The thing is, I mean, I don't enjoy it either. Just so we are clear about this, I don't do it. I know there are people who jump into the ice bath, and they're like, “Oh, this is fun for me.” It's not easy for me. The reason why I go is more like a mind over matter.

How can I stay calm in a moment of distress? And so I consider it more a sort of extreme meditation. Similar reasons why I've experimented with free diving and stuff like that.

And so, yes, just to be clear, I don't enjoy the ice bath either, but I enjoy calming my mind in that environment.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Okay. To control your mind so that you can resist the impact.

Viola Eva: And I would say it's actually the opposite. It's more about letting go than it is about controlling.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh, okay. And you also say hiking. So what was the best hike you had in your life?

Viola Eva: I think one of my favorites, and unfortunately the one that ruined my knee, was in Peru. And we're doing the Salkantay Trek, which is a trek when you go to Machu Picchu. You can do the Salkantay Trek as a way of sort of getting there. And we hiked there with a group, and it was really, I think, as far as being high up, a completely different landscape, obviously beautiful. So this was probably like 10 years ago now.

For example, I was at Machu Picchu about three years ago, and they're much stricter now around what you can and cannot do. But 10 years ago, it was a lot freer, sort of how you could walk around there, and obviously, that ending there was very beautiful and impressive.

But I think the hike, which was a three- or four-day hike through the trail, was also very good for me. It's just unfortunate that there's one day when you go down, I believe, almost a thousand meters, and then halfway through, on a sort of gravel, it pulled my knee.

And then obviously there's no street, there's no car, there's no rescue. Still had to walk down the rest for several hours. And my knee has not recovered from it ever.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh, sorry.

Viola Eva: So it was the most beautiful one, but also the one that has most long-lastingly affected my life after this.

Gianluca Fiorelli: Oh. Sorry to hear it. So Viola, it's already been more than an hour since we are talking. I mean, it went very fast.

Viola Eva: It's been very easy to do so. Yes, I agree. Thank you so much.

Gianluca Fiorelli: You're welcome. And so let me say bye-bye to our friends now because it's also time for you to go.

Thank you again for staying with us until now, and remember to subscribe to the channel and ring, so as to be notified when a new episode is going to pop up. Thank you and bye-bye.

Gianluca Fiorelli

Podcast Host

Gianluca Fiorelli

With almost 20 years of experience in web marketing, Gianluca Fiorelli is a Strategic and International SEO Consultant who helps businesses improve their visibility and performance on organic search. Gianluca collaborated with clients from various industries and regions, such as Glassdoor, Idealista, Rastreator.com, Outsystems, Chess.com, SIXT Ride, Vegetables by Bayer, Visit California, Gamepix, James Edition and many others.

A very active member of the SEO community, Gianluca daily shares his insights and best practices on SEO, content, Search marketing strategy and the evolution of Search on social media channels such as X, Bluesky and LinkedIn and through the blog on his website: IloveSEO.net.

Share on social media
Share on social media

stay in the loop

Subscribe for more inspiration.